Philosophy of History (History of Philosophy): Part X -
The Sequential Rectification Involved in the 
Modification of Factual Re-Assessment *

0.   Introduction

	It has been tentatively argued that through the sequential nature of intentional formation and deposition that all historical reflection and production/re-production is malformed through errors in that sequential formation. (1)

	Let us investigate this level of sequential malformation and the manner of rectification necessary for the modification of factual re-assessment. (2)

1.   A Theoretical Perspective

	Facts, in phenomenal-phenomenological formation, are never absolutely wrong nor right, and, are only modified in re-assessment. (3)

	Formation, malformation and rectification are sequentially orchestrated. (4)

	Orchestration is conducted in the proposed light of ‘evidence’. (5)

	The presentation of ‘evidence’ is a meta-textually controlled activity. (6)

	Control is exercised through the nature of the genre or genres involved. (7)

	Thus formation and malformation are controlled by a defined sense of process however complex its manner of operation associated with that mix of genres. (8)

	Thus mistakes made in sequencing take on an expected nature through the relatively definitive nature of those defective possibilities. (9)

	Let us examine this from a practical point of view(and briefly examine the nature of evidence in a critical perspective). (10)

2.   A Practical Perspective

All relationships, in their intentional constitution, are constituted in and through the simulations of the hermeneutic circle (as previously noted). (11)

	Through the hermeneutic circle the world-for-us is sequenced. (12)

	Therein the textual and the meta-textual, and, (their suspended relationship in the form of) the non-textual coincide in the representation of apparent ‘evidence’. (13)

Latest version of paper: www.homestead.com/noelshomepage/noelshomepage3.html 
	An overall factual-assembly that is treated as valid but as a sixth order factual is actually invalid, and, an overall factual-assembly that is treated as invalid but as a sixth order factual is actually valid, through non-coincidence (between the fifth order of potential-factual treatment and sixth order of actual-factual treatment) is the basis for a consideration of malformation of that overall factual assembly. (14)

	And the same applies equally to factual-components that constitute an overall factual-assembly. (15)

	Truth values directly alter the treatment of the constitution of assemblies and components in regards to the features under evaluation. (16)

	E.g., the specific factual-assembly (with the indexical) ‘this cat is on that mat’ treated as a valid means ‘this cat is on that mat’, whereas if treated as invalid means ‘this cat is not on that mat’ (even if initially presented as a positive assertion). (17)

	Thus a valid assertion or an invalid assertion are transformations given this shift from a fifth order status of potentiality to a sixth order status of actuality. (18)

	Without applying neither naïve realist nor non-transcendental idealist interpretations to our phenomenological treatments of actual-factuality. (19)

	Simulations and transformations, etc., being achieved through positionings and re-positionings simulated within the overall hermeneutic circle (through the adequate exercise of an overall transcendental suspension). (20)

	Errors within the same, therefore, must arise through mis-sequencing, de-sequencing and contra-sequencing. (21)

	Could error take any other form? (22)

	No, because all intentional activity is meta-textually driven and thence textual error must arise through errors within that form of motivation. (23)

	Similarly, meta-textual error arises through errors in meta-meta-textual malformation, i.e., through meta-contra-sequencing, etc. (24)

	Thence the sequencing of textual formation and the malformation of the same; rectification being through a reversal of the latter. (25)

	Through sequenced defects in identification, operations, accommodations, transformations, and meta-transformational considerations of all of the same. (26)

	Including the ascription of factual truth through the asserted transformation from a fifth order of possibility to a sixth order status. (27)

	So, e.g., this (phenomenon) is a cat (phenomenon) could be wrongly identified, or, the imputed phenomenon apparently indexed may have no basis at all. (28)

	Sequential errors being respectively, mis-sequenced (through incorrect indexation and identification), or, de-sequenced through, e.g., not developing a process of adequate identification (in the mode ascribed). (29)

	Contra-sequential failure could arise, e.g., in the situation where a person (e,g, a young child) ascribes an actual-factual status to a mythical ‘Santa Claus’ even though Santa Claus as a mythological-cultural construct has a actual-factual status in those more narrow terms of reference (as evidently and evidentially ascertained). (30)

	Practical considerations, therefore, need to correctly identify and correctly relate all relevant factors in the ‘presentation’ of our factual state of affairs. (31)

	How are correctness, validity, truthfulness, verification and confirmation to be arrived at? (32)

3.   A Critical Perspective

Through the application of a critical dimension to our research through a careful exposition of the findings of our research as realized through the critical control exercised by the application of our relevant genres of exposition. (33)

As determined through the relevant concordance of our topic. (34)

As determined through propriety, appropriateness and validity, etc. (35)

As exercised in the rectification of the overall transcendental suspension! (36)

The suspension of this suspension allowing us to directly experience this phenomenally constituted alignment with phenomenologically re-constituted reality. (37)

	Thence our critical path through the world through these ongoing incremental modifications as re-alignments. (38)

Propriety is operating correctly within genre expectations and/or through a re-correction of the same. (39)

	Appropriateness is realized with the correct genre expectations are correctly brought to bear upon the topic of our research (in regards to textual traces and their re-incorporation into narrated/re-narrated texts, etc.). (40)

	Validity being realized through critical acts of judgment (in regards to propriety and appropriateness, within the hermeneutic circle). (41)

	As exercised in and through the overall transcendental suspension in the comparative light of the existential excess therein released (through the ongoing suspension of the suspension, etc.). (42)

	Thence the realization of an increased degree of concordance between ‘the possibility of that reality’ and ‘the reality of that possibility’. (43)
	Moreover, when a factual component and/or a factual-assembly is asserted or non-asserted and is found to be invalid (as a transformation[al argument]) then rectification normally is realized through the reversal of signs (of assertion and/or de-assertion). (44)

	The phenomenal-phenomenological presentation of evidence should establish the same. (45)

	What establishes the same – a state of transformational isomorphic concordance throughout all six orders. (46)

E. g., this idealized phenomenon of a cat presentation is relatively harmonized internally within those terms of reference; implying pre-essential order; and is intact essentially, forms a coherent idea (with or without relevant de-ontological inputs); and, is pragmatically relevant to the direct and/or indirect perceptual observations required; does not infringe its ontical possibilities; and, in the modes of reference can be established as an actual-factual, i.e., as a fact with a positive assertion of truth (given the overall provisional terms of reference to date). (47)

From errors in such, given both the diverse complexity and the transcendental unity of the same, it follows that a presentation is subject to rectification through modification to its intentional sequencing. (48)

	And this is mapped out through our ordered analysis. (49)

4.   Provisional Conclusion

	Factual modification is realized through rectification of sequential error. (50)

Research being re-engaged through the re-simulation of the simulation/re-simulation. (51)

	Historical research emphasizes the retrospective, and, through a causal life of its own spills over into the living-present and thence to a fruitful future to be determined both qualitatively and quantitatively in reference to such evidence. (52)

	Evidence is always to hand in some form through the apparent degree and manner of the isomorphic coincidence realized non-textually within the hermeneutic circle of comprehension. (53)

	Thence our phenomenal-phenomenological ability to do history (and a philosophy of history) through the necessary existence of the non-textual (and the not-textual transcendence of the same through the overall transcendental suspension)! (54)

							    Noël Tointon, Sydney, 15.8.07.