Philosophy of History (History of Philosophy): Part VIII -
The Rectification of Historical Error*

0.   Introduction

	History is correctly conducted through a rectification of historical error in and through a process of the resolution of the re-problematization of our historical topic/s and/or historical issue/s. (0)

1.   Text

	Through noting the transformations to hand and the resultant transformation of the same that result from our process of historical reflection and its re-evaluation. (1)

Because all texts are meta-textually dependent, and v.v, therefore the nature of all apparent errors are already pre-defined by virtue of those genres utilized. (2) 

Through errors within a genre of de-sequencing and mis-sequencing, and, between the mis-application of genres through processes of contra-sequencing. (3)

Because all intentional processes of simulation/re-simulation are sequenced in their formation and this is reflected in their intentional depositions. (4)

Thus history involves a recognition and rectification of apparent error. (5)

The erroneous nature of error is realized through processes of appreciation. (6)

	Therein historical value is amplified if this process of re-simulation and re-simulated appreciation is correctly conducted. (7)

I.e., as a transcendental affair. (8)

	Through internal aesthetics and external pragmatics, along with all other relevant forms of (ordered) value, etc. (9)

	Thence the progressive nature of historical research (through resultant processes of re-transformation)! (10)

2.   Conclusion

	Truth cannot be treated as definitive but error can be by virtue of the definitive nature of genre through an appreciation of the manner of its application. (11)

	Thence the rectification of historical error is a progressive possibility through a recognition of the relatively definitive nature of its erroneous production! (12)
							      Noël Tointon, Sydney, 3.8.07.

Latest version of paper: www.homestead.com/noelshomepage/noelshomepage3.html