40 NATURAL AXIOMS FUNDAMENTAL TO INFORMATION THEORY

1.	Information as energy necessitates a state of affairs such that the terms of reference of the situation consist in 	i.	- a relative standing wave (X), and 
	ii.	- variations (a) encoded in the same.

2.	The standing wave itself as an informational medium is in a relationship to a more encompassing standing wave (Y).

3.	As a consequence of 2. information can never be lost only made or found to be inaccessible (even though the ‘standing wave’ or its equivalent as herein defined must be effectively destroyed in order to produce/re-produce its informational content although its minimal information content as X, i.e., a-bearing is preserved in Y).

4.	Extremes in the expression of the standing wave either destroy information accessibility or make it unable to express information above the natural uncertainty of background fluctuations.

5.	As a standing wave forms a psychic background stored informational content can never approach, equal nor exceed 50% of that medium, for too much information "a" destroys the function of X as "a" - bearing.

6.	In a system if X can be re-tuned to form X', etc. then the constraints of the informational content of that system are related to the definition of the fine tuning.

7.	Encoding of deeper structural/functional information implies that the reading of that system implies a de-encoding with a repeated direct effectively-reversed isomorphic coincidence between these two sequential processes.

8.	Definition of information can not be read through a single unit of information as the establishment of the informational unit necessitates the contextual appreciation of other informational units or moments.

9.	The movement from one effective unit of information to the next sets in motion the establishment of informational de-encoding, but the shift in meaning from "a" to "b" does not imply ex-system that this shift is either
	i.	- immediate or direct, or whether it is
	ii. 	- merely coincidental.

10.	Appreciation of informational de-encoding significance must be read ex-system in a higher form of informational contextualization implying the necessary existence of higher standing wave systems encapsulating that under previous review.

11.	Restoration of information necessitates, as a pre-condition, the restoration of the standing wave encoding informational content intended for the focus of appreciation.

12.	Information can be neither determined through or from the standing wave or the unit of information in themselves but only through an appreciation of their encapsulated juxtaposition.

13.	Our relationship to the standing wave is a type of encoding, whether that relationship be an encoding or a de-encoding can only be appreciated outside the standing wave reference.

14.	Encoding/de-encoding and establishment of the standing wave format necessitate the resolution of relational dissonance, i.e. no resolution-reception no informational-relationship.

15.	X as a psychic background necessitates the appropriate application and distance of a relevant psychic distance from a, and hence likewise in the appreciation of X-(r)-a.

16.	Information retrieval can be inadequate or incorrect it can never be dishonest through the reversal of the encoding process.

17.	The information stored as information can only be that if stored as an integrated system within its own terms of reference, unresolved contradictions and un-integrated information unit/sections destroy the viability of the system as a gestalt totality.

18. 	Information cannot be correctly discerned in the form of discrete units, duplication ensures determination of unit-context, therefore through redundancy meaning is essentially fixed through backgrounding.

19.	The structural nature of the backgrounding process determines the hierarchical nature of the spectrum between the simplest or most elementary unit-moments and the context of the standing wave(s).

20.	All forms of encoding / de-encoding must ultimately disestablish, to some finite degree, the encoding process through the natural reciprocity of all relationships, unless re-established through the process of the de-encoding / encoding itself/themselves

21.	Information is lost through reduplication unless errors can be either
	i.	- rectified in the process, or
	ii.	- corrected after retrieval.

22.	The standing wave as an effective medium determines the most elemental momentary definition of meaning possible in such a frame of reference, informational transfer never transgressing the maximum limits imposed by the frequency of the standing wave nor the minimal conditions in the determinacy of the informational moment.

23.	De-encoding in a virtual sense necessitates the process destruction of the standing wave in order to exhibit the informational content of the informational moment therein contained.

24.	That the standing wave can only suggest its rhythmicality in informational moments through pulsing.

25.	That informational content can be added or subtracted through the variation and qualification imposed upon the pulsing of the standing wave.

26.	That definitional detail of informational moments once realized, in encoding or de-encoding, can only be reinforced upon further focusing of our scrutiny.

27.	That the nature of the informational moment reflects the nature of all other associated informational moments pulsed within the ambit of the standing wave.

28.	Informational transfer necessitates the intersubjectivity, or parallelization, of informational content and process, i.e. detail and its grammatical enstructuring.

29.	Encoding and de-encoding necessitates an effective potential synchronicity which is facilitated through the pulsing of the standing wave.

30.	The informational moment is an essentialization of the essential context therein intended through such analogical mapping.

31.	Through the impossibility of pure potentiality thence the establishment of our Natural Axiom No. 3.

32.	The resonance relationship between the polarities of potentiality and actuality establishes the necessary preconditions for the presentation and re-presentation of the informational process.

33.	Through the impossible presence of pure actuality, i.e. completely actualized actuality, definition cannot be absolutely certain, however, through essentialization essential integrity once established can effectively establish this for us, the redundancy of informational content in the backgrounding of the standing wave further establishing this definitional integrity.

34.	Through the impossible presence of pure potentiality, completely potentialized potentiality, informational content can never be absolutely destroyed only lost, mislaid or blocked.

35.  The relationship between the potentialized actuality and the actualized potentiality establishing the nature of the relationship between the informational moment and the standing wave.

36.  The finer detail of an apparent informational moment if present establishing minimum informational recognition.

37.	Although information appears to be transmitted via informational moments in reality, ontological and epistemological, information is transmitted through the systematic reconstitution of a totality as a totality.

38.	Because the constitution of the standing wave X is in Y
reconstitution of Y can recreate and transmit the virtualness of X without the necessary recourse to the apparent conditions of X as it appears relative to its present or previous modes of presentation and/or re-presentation.

39.	Therefore in accordance with Natural Axiom 38 the relativity of informational processing is dependent upon both its initiation and its mode of presentation or re-presentation.

40.	That all information is processed through the associated process of the relevant relationship and that the experience of an apparent relationship is processed through the ongoing transfer of information preconditional to its informed reception.

Edited: 6.10.99