Appendix I
A Deeper Appreciation And Realization Of Economic Value

Introduction

	I would like to outline in this appendix a short re-evaluation of economic theory in the light of the research done in this volume on the nature of authentic value creation. Philosophic endeavour should always flow into the sphere of daily life in a positive manner. Although recognizing the provisional nature of our research we can still gauge the relative merits of the perspective adopted and the depth of appreciation therein engaged. Hence this determination to steer a middle path between absolutist and relativist positions in this regard. The following proposals being only footnotes for the start of a project that would appreciate the phenomenon of miscellaneous forms of economic management currently in play, and, prepare the ground for a a deeper reinterpretation of this phenomenon in order to realize a greater economic value creation in the widest sense of this term.
	A general re-evaluation of economic theory is desperately needed after the collapse of communist economies and the increasingly defective nature of market and non-market responses in the more capitalistic world. To this end I offer the following tentative contributions for this task of reconstruction, in some form or other, that must be entertained, preferably sooner than later.
	This sketch will be conducted under the following headings, namely, Initial Comments, General Existential Theory, Economic Simulation, Reciprocity, Meta-Economic Re-Simulation, Transformational Treatment, Existential Non-Intervention, Additional Points and Conclusion.

1.	Initial Comments

	This exposition wishes to address a number of apparent economic problems, namely:
i	Effective non-reciprocity in economic relationships 			(when all relationships should be characterized by 
a reciprocity of process between all its participants).
		E.g., payment of pensions not already worked for 				through some form of taxation/insurance.
		E.g., the careless dispersal and disposal of 				waste products, etc.
		E.g., the use of environment without taking into 				full account the cost of replacement, damage 
done, aesthetic loss, etc.
ii	Misuse/disuse of capital, resources, infrastructure, 			institution, etc.
		E.g., wages stored under the mattress situation.
		E.g., under-use of transport system by those that 	
	have in some form or other subsidized it and/or 			inflict a cost on others not taken into account 			through their use of other forms of transport.
iii	General loss of value.
		E.g., through forms of inefficiency, etc.
iv	The need for mechanisms that establish an enhancement 			of value.
		E.g., the need for the development of industries 				that could sensibly be located within one's 
own economy.
v	Development of equity in balance with the need for a 			minimum development of equitable equity in 
transactions 	associated with the same.
		E.g., wages commensurate in the long term with 				replacement potential, cost of training and 				education, seniority, productivity, etc.
vi	A recognition for a steady rate in expansion in balance 
		with a rapid adaptational flexibility in decision 			making in real practice.
		E.g., steady state in the rate of expansion/ 		
			contraction of the money supply, drawing 
rights, pricing, forms of auction value-determination,etc.
vii	Creation, preservation and maximum utilization of 		
	capital and sensible recognition of capital/plant 			replacement, etc.
		E.g., the need for an efficiency in capital 					expenditure and the necessity for its 
Monitored description and interpretation.
		E.g., utilization of actual and potential savings 	
in all forms.
viii	Maximum reasonable deployment of labour.
		E.g., the establishment of relatively full 					employment.
		E.g., the deployment of labour in work suiting the 
			person concerned, their aspirations, 
education, etc.
ix	Existential creation, management and diminishment of 	
	debt.
		E.g., sensible creation of productive debt.
		E.g., sensible diminishment in debt.
x	A need to recognize and utilize responsibility and its 	
commensurate reward.
		E.g., introduction of responsibility to bring back 
		a responsibility and responsiveness in the 
work place.
xi	A need for mechanisms that satisfactorily discharge the 
	resolution of disputes.
		E.g., need for ongoing resolution of actual and 				potential disputes on all levels of the 
economy.
xiii	The development of a theoretical and practical 				philosophy of existential non-intervention in the 			economy.
		E.g., the removal of forms of distortion imposed 				through taxation anomalies, blanket taxation, 			other artifacts, etc.
		E.g., the establishment of self-correcting 					economic mechanisms
xiv	Need for adequate modeling and interpretation, and, 			existential non-interventional monitoring of the 			economy.	

	This exposition also wishes to establish mechanisms that develop reciprocity, maximum transfer of information, flexibility; steady state expansion; minimal blanket taxation; maximum efficiency in management of capital, etc.; maximum simulation and re-simulation of economy; methods of existential self-correction and self-evaluation, survival in the world of real-economics; true realization, preservation and utilization of capital; true cost reflection, etc.

2.	General Existential Theory

	The establishment of a system and meta-system (and a meta-meta-system) wherein all variables are considered provisional and publicly published whenever these variables are effectively changed. Mechanisms for transference, transformation and translation between or within these levels of simulation.
	Forms of existential non-intervention that re-establish forms of ongoing equilibrium through automatic re-pricing mechanisms, minimal blanket tax, interest rates, wages, evaluations, projections, etc., in a state of steady rate expansion.
	No forms of capital, etc., that remain non-utilized or under utilized.
	Systems that encourage maximum information transfer, reciprocity, etc.
	Systems that encourage maximum ongoing resolution of dissonance, integration, responsibility, participation, etc.
	The establishment of general and specific mechanisms for the creation and monitoring, preservation, dispersal and disposal of value, etc.
	Integration and monitoring of all economic data in one computerized system.
	Mechanisms that signal abuse of system from within or without that system.
	Mechanisms for the intertranslation of tokens (drawing rights, cash), performances and forms of obligation.
	Let me now detail some of these proposals.

3.	Economic Simulation 

	In an object frame of economic reference goods and services can be traded directly for other goods and/or services. With the convenient advent of money, or bills of debt intent, etc., the cumbersome nature of battering essentially in a similar region of space/time was circumvented to a considerable extent. This aspect could be treated as a meta-economic level of social activity. For the harmonious functioning of economic interactions in the long term both the object-level and the meta-level must essentially mirror each other. Likewise the treatment of the cash economy with its cash, drawing right, and other straight forward transactions must essentially mirror any meta-meta-economy that creates value in its financial treatment of such a level of activity through e.g., banking, insurance, super-annuation, etc.
	Now the object of simulational rewriting is to ensure that changes engineered on one frame of reference are constructively reflected on some other level. E.g., credit is arranged in order to create or facilitate some particular object performance. Then profit derived from that object performance can be translated back into the meta-frame of reference (or meta-meta-frame of reference). The net result is that value is created without that creation exacting costs that neutralize the net effect of that performance. Moreover, the concept of general value enhancement must be accumulative in the sense that after consumption their is still a net creation of value in some form, e.g., capital, infrastructure, institutional establishment, an educated member of society, etc.
	Effectively, simulational rewriting is entertained in order to established an enhanced form of overall value creation. In the long term changes in one frame of reference must be undone in such a manner that the overall effect is the creation of non-consumed value. This must also take into account the real relative cost of environmental intervention, e.g., farming, mining, building, etc. I.e., farm land must have its potential for agricultural forms of yield upgraded and improved (at minimal expense to the natural environment), mining must restore the land mined to a state of general purpose use above and beyond further mining, building must improve the aesthetic and pragmatic configuration of stock to hand, etc.

4.	Reciprocity 

	Reciprocity is the ability for the relationship to adequately intercommunicate with its participating factors and aspects. Distortions in this state of interaction within this relationship and between it and its external relational environment will effectively undermine the relational health of that relationship. The greater the degree of reciprocity the more authentic our participation in that relationship.
	Pricing mechanisms in a capitalistic economy can be one way for an economy to effectively establish this ongoing state of relational authenticity. Relational health being indicated by the extent of reciprocity, the degree of informational non-distortion, the ability to adapt to changing environmental circumstances, real growth, development, obvious value enhancement, etc.
	Effectively, having mapped out our various frames of reference we endeavour to promote the free passage of informational forms of exchange, etc. This in itself should promote growth and lead to a healthy interaction and balance between these meta-levels of economic activity. To be noted that no system should be rewritten purely in the terms of one level or type of reference.

5.	Meta-Economic Re-Simulation 

	In order to stimulate and/or enrich a certain level of economic activity a higher level of economic organization should be instituted in such a manner that it can be translated into the wealth of the lower level but minus a certain degree of discount in order to delay this process of conversion to the advantage of the person who maintains this state of conversional postponement.
	Effectively, a state of credit is instituted that facilitates the relative object level's economic performance (which through conversional delay allows the virtual value created in the higher meta-level in the long term to be actualized and paid out if ever called upon to complete this task).

6.	Transformational Treatment 

	Transformation between states of the same meta-status, between different degrees in meta-status contributing eventually either to the increase or diminishment of real wealth in the nominated long term.
	Effectively, mechanisms are instituted that assist the creation of value on and between meta-levels of activity in such a manner that the net result is the eventual creation of real value. Such procedures necessitates the mapping of all meta-levels and meta-aspects of economic activity, institution of maximum reciprocity, realistic processes of transformation, measures that institute ongoing economic stability, etc.

7.	Existential Non-Intervention 

	EXistential non-intervention is the spontaneous institution of responses that assist in the creation of excess value in a net beneficial form. Here attention must be paid to cost, competition, quality of service, quantity of product, etc. The maximum degree of reciprocity being instituted in those segment so that the economic environment that can adapt to changing circumstances, etc.
	Generally the adoption of those procedures that establish the existential merit of such structural-functions.

8.	Additional Points 

	The general adoption of those procedures that establish an existential climate of trust, responsibility, etc. 
	In effect a watering and weeding on and between the various meta-levels of economic activity pertaining to the overall system under review with a general avoidance of those procedures that involve the direct intervention in that economic system.

Conclusion

	The adoption of those procedures that stress self-management, a middle path in all forms of activity and reflection, a mapping of meta-structural-functions, the establishment of increased reciprocity and intercommunicational effectiveness, installation of modern technology in those forms that assist the integration of that system, establishment of existential non-interventional forms of procedures that develop the grounds for authentic value enhancement, etc. Forms of direct manipulation, e.g., taxation, occuring in insignificant amounts on all stages in the manufacture or performance of a `product,' etc., but with a net result spread throughout the process taking on in the final account an adequate and significant impact.

Some Additional Notes:
A Theoretically Unified Economic System Of Value Creation

	In this theoretical account I desire to re-create an economic system by re-defining, i.e., re-describing/re-interpreting aspects of the current economic system as already function (e.g., in the state of Australia both internally and externally) and imposing upon this structural-functional phenomenal descriptive-interpretation a new set of integrated and self-intergrating structural-functions of a higher order. I.e., ostensively the economic landscape may not have appeared to have changed but the relationship between the lower order factors has been re-written in a more efficient manner. 
	To establish this higher order re-interpretation it is my endeavour to incorporate certain guide-lines, pre-established in my ethical-relational philosophy and my general philosophy of value-creation, in such a manner as to facilitate a higher order of self-integration and harmony and as a consequence self-promote a greater degree of ongoing value creation. 

Primary Practical Objective: To re-write economic relationships in order to remove from current economic models, and their instantiated modeling, signs of disharmony that fail to adequately reharmonize the overall system. E.g., the increasing co-presence of higher inflation and unemployment, asset devaluation, etc.

Primary Theoretical Objective: The incorporation of certain existential principles and the formation of a simplified archetypal economic system to dialectically rewrite such elementary factors co-definitionally.

General Principles As dialectical guidelines:

1.	Improved reciprocity of informational interaction.
2.	W.r.t. 1. greater equity in cross-relationships.
3.	Self-stabalization of 1. and 2.
4.	Promotion of natural forms of self-promoted value 		5.	Greater active self-reflection.	        creation.
6.	Promotion of systems of responsibility.
7.	Greater degrees of inter-systemic convertability.
8.	A greater degree of inherent systemic flexibility.
9.	Mechanisms for archetypal inter-translation.
10.	Mechanisms for higher order interpretative translation.

General Practical Principles For The Intentional Resolution Of the Theoretical Guide-lines As Noted Above.

1.	The enplacement and enpowerment of those practices that existentially establish the above!

Archetypal Economic Modeling

Let us propose a simplified economu of three factors that in effect mutually co-define (the intentional being of) each other.

1.	Incomings: Simulation of money (as drawing rights) from e.g., wages, investments, profits, etc.
2.	Outcomings: Expenditure (as drawing rights) on effort, materials, etc., expended in course of business transaction.
3.	Products: Developed through outcomings and traded/consumed through incoming deposits (as drawing rights).

4.	Mutual co-definition of terms:
I.e., I = -O + -P; O = -I + -P; P = -O + -I.
5.	System grounded in G = Government: = International, National, Semi-National and Local.
6.	All three aspects of our archetypal system, on all levels of G, are taxed according to certain published but variable formulae. 

On Establishing Our Two Tier System

We can now erect a first order system that appears to be closed by I, O, and P in G. However, this apparent artificial closure is circumvented in the second order system through a mutual co-definitional thematization of the first order system along phenomenological-hermeneutical-existential lines of approach.

Now let us investigate theoretically intervention of G on I, O and P and vice versa, goverments tax and execute services which in turn could be taxed, etc.

			P							P'

	     I		O...........>G>..........I'        O'

=> I+I', O+O', P+P'

Now should total economy be G, -G + G, just -G. 
Both G and -G are extremes (Communistic command economy versu the captalistic voluntary government). 
Therefore E = x.-G + y.G
The role of G re-written on an existential level as a facilitor of economic health. E.g., stabalizing I through excess withdrawal of excess I on a temporary/permanent basis, with, or without, fixed/non-fixed term forms of compensation. In a similar fashion O could be rewritten on a variable basis with a GST rebate (after NZ) to cut production costs (vis-a-vis ointernational markets)?

How do we re-=write these three terms in G on a mutually co-definitional basis.

Apparent final consumption of P should equal (O + I)/2
 => Total accumulated national product T...

T = a.(O+I+P)/3 where a = factor of efficiency.