Part II

2.	Introduction

1. Repetition is necessary for the recognition 
of the phenomenon through retention.
2. Pure repetition is as equally impossible as is the repetition of the purely non-repetitive.
3. Repetition being oriented towards either conforming 
mere repetition or non-conforming sheer repetition.11
4. Mere repetition re-establishing a sense of consonant background versus a provocatively dissonant foreground.
5. Sheer repetition is provocative by virtue of it straddling this polarity of similarity and dis-similarity.
6. The provocative nature of sheer repetition is in contrast to the effective introduction of sheer dissonance.12
7. Ongoing resolution of this relationship between mere and sheer repetition establishing the sense of the relationship.
8. The sense of intentional formation being established through this provocatively oriented process of resolution.13
9. No intentional formation without its meta-textual adoption and adaptation of genre in a hierarchy of genre.14
10. The significance of intentionality being established through this process of transcendental harmonization.
11. Significance generated between the contradiction of 
the metaphor and the tautology of the rhetorical question.15
12. The rhetorical gesture establishing the meta-textual function of its simulated metaphorical structures.
13. The analogical nature of the metaphor being generated 
in the contradiction of the `is like' and the `is not like.'
14. The rhetorical gesture of the question being generated through the metaphorical presuppositions of a tautology.
15. The parties in a metaphor or question being established in the contrast between forms of mere and sheer repetition.
16. Metaphorical meaningfulness meta-textually directed,
metaphorical meaning rhetorically driven.16
17. Significance derived through a process of 
rhetorical-question-and-metaphorical-answer.
18. The rhetorical functioning through the balanced suspension of the either/or central to the question.
19. The metaphorical functioning analogically through the balanced suspension of the conjunction of the either/or.
20. This rhetorical-metaphorical chain, plus their joint suspension, forming an hermeneutic circle.
21. This suspension of the metaphorical and rhetorical giving us access to the constituted through re-constitution.
22. Rhetoric functions through its synthetic instability 
on the stability of its presuppositional ground.
23. Metaphor structures through its analytic stability 
on the instability of its presuppositional ground.
24. Textual integration establishing genre and its detail establishing the textual adaptation of such adoption.
25. The analytical, or reductive, converting into the synthetic, or reconstitutional, through conversion, and v.v.
26. Conversion establishing this transformational circuit 
through the dis-conjunction of the conjunction and v.v.
27. Suspension of both the con-junction and the dis-junction
establishing the already constituted and re-constituted.17
28. Determination of significance being a transformational process conducted through forms of ongoing suspension.
29. The experience of value as the result of an 
ongoing transcendental process of resolution.18
30. One transcendental form but six cognitive fields from the perspective of the non-transcendental cognitive. 
31. Divided between three poles of the phenomenologically-essential, ethically-existential and hermeneutical-fields.
32. Namely, Essential, Aesthetical, Ethical, Pragmatical, Hermeneutical and Factual fields through bi-polar relations.
33. Realized through the relative suppression 
of one or two of these three polarities. 
34. Respectively, subject-field, field-field, object-field, object-object, object-subject, subject-subject.19
35. The hermeneutic as centered on the reconstitution of 
the horizons that reconstitute that textualized phenomenon.
36. Through an effective suppression of intentional subjectivity and intentional objectivity.
37. Though an effective suppression of all other forms 
of value whether primary or transcendental in complexity. 
38. Determination through meta-textual location, textual-characterization and their transformations in and between.20
39. Transformations involving processes of change between facets of mere repetition and sheer repetition.
40. Involving a dialectical relationship between processes of transformational invariance and variational transition.
41. Therein establishing a re-creation of text
through a reconstruction of its re-construction.21
42. Through reconstructed confirmation of its re-constructed conformation thence an evaluation of its unique truth-value. 
43. Although founded on structured and processed repetition
the truth-value of each relationships is absolutely unique.
44. Transcendental determination of truth-value giving us direct access to the re-simulation of that relationship.22
45. This determination subjecting itself to error correcting
mechanisms through the isomorphic nature of textuality.
46. Through transformational invariance of the isomorphic nature of the textual-metatextual interrelationship, e.g.23
47. Hence the critical appreciation of value is also 
a critical evaluation of its uniqueness in truth-value.
48. Thence the critical appreciation of the `poetic' must also be a critical evaluation of its `poeticality.'
49. Thence the simultaneous co-determination of its hermeneutical-truth and its aesthetical-value, etc.
50. Hence the critical appreciation of a text must 
also be a critical evaluation of its `truth-value.'24

Part III

3.	The Metaphorical And Rhetorical Dimensions

1. Through rhetorical-question and metaphorical-answer
the significance of a text is progressively re-performed.
2. The rhetorical dimensions of genre being established through genre recognition and exercise.
3. Multi-rhetorical approaches eventually reproducing more powerfully the richness of that text.
4. Through rhetorical gestures that release greater degrees of hermeneutic value than the psychic energy invested.
5. The value released informing the reader whether the text is well-formed, enriched, meta-textually adequate, etc.
6. Hermeneutic value and textual integrity generated and 
re-simulated within and between sequences of provocation.

4.	The Release Of Hermeneutic Value

1. Aestheticality is released through the intensity of value
realized in the appropriate reconstruction of that text.
2. That value is primarily experienced and re-experienced as a transcendental phenomenon, i.e., trans-cognitively, etc. 
3. Value being realized through the spontaneity of judgment
in the suspension, etc. of our recognized prejudices.
4. I.e., suspension of pre-judgments, metaphorical treatment of reduction, and, rhetorical treatment of reconstitution.
5. The value created in this hermeneutic circle being generated through the resolution of provocative facets.
6. Relationships being experientially created and re-created through the ongoing resolution of the relatively dissonant.
7. Internally and externally boundaries of a relationship are simulated through their relational involvement.
8. The release of value in general, and hermeneutic value in particular, taking place through processes of transgression.
9. Traversing across, crossing over, re-crossing and crossing out of such relative non-absolute boundaries.
10. Such necessary transgression assisting us in 
the appreciation of that textualized phenomenon.
11. Through meta-textual location, characterization of population and transformations within and between the same.
12. `Re-writing' constructively and/or deconstructively through mere repetition and/or sheer repetition.

5.	Poetic Devices As Provocative Mechanisms

1. All provocative structural-functions straddle mere repetition and sheer repetition.
2. Recognized through the resolution of processes of similarity and dissimilarity in the same section of text.
3. Integrating and re-enforcing therein the creation and realization of the hermeneutic value of that text.
4. Imperfect use of textual devices creating either a sense of mere genre or a sense of sheer, unresolved dissonance.

6.	That Aesthetic Texts Should Reflect The Total Psyche

1. Aesthetic satisfaction is derived from a text that reflects and harmonizes all major regions of the psyche.
2. Because the aesthetic power, and value, of the text is re-created through the re-simulated resolution of the same.
3. Emotional energies being cognitively juxtaposed and discharged through transcendental processes of resolution.
4. Cognitive manipulation being conducted metaphorically and/or rhetorically but resolved transcendentally.
5. Affect being either directly analogued or indicated indirectly through the appreciation of connotation.
6. The collective ratios between these three levels in the psyche indicating the experiential center of that text.
7. The collective center of gravity between these regions giving us the transcendental location of that text.
8. The transcendental ease of access to that text inversely reflecting its location in this epistemological hierarchy.

7.	The Successful Aesthetic Text As Re-Invaginated

1. The experience of textual richness is dependent upon the quality of replication in the thematization of text.
2. And is dependent on the density of appropriate textual devices along with an overall sense of re-invagination.
3. Through a repeated folding over of the text upon itself in an eruption and resolution of meta-textual discontinuity.
4. That such textual richness in generated and conducted both meta-textually and/or textually.
5. Re-invagination of genre being conducted meta-textually
through evocation, invocation, revocation, convocation, etc.
6. Re-invagination of text through the recognition of the repetition of parallel provocative structural-processes.
7. Success in ongoing resolution establishes aestheticality,
translated from the perspective of the transcendental.
8. The ongoing imposition of the transcendental suspension
permits our reading of that text to perform aesthetically.
9. The integrity of text being continually established and re-established through the overlapping of provocation.
10. Hence the text is naturally re-invaginated; richness and integrity establishing its overall aesthetic coherence.

8.	Textual Appreciation As Neither Transparent Nor Opaque

1. The impossibility of pure mere repetition always leaving open the possibility that a text is imperfectly replicated.
2. The intersubjective hierarchical disposition of pre-constituted meta-genre implying that no text can be opaque.
3. The relative non-release of additional hermeneutic value establishing the provisional determination of that text.
4. The inter-commensurability of textual phenomena being established through the impossibility of sheer difference.
5. Hermeneutic `self-transformation' establishing textual emendation and/or rectification through re-performance.
6. The ongoing imposition of an informed suspension
converting reconstruction into a re-construction of text.

9.	The Phenomenological Treatment Of Textuality

1. Phenomenological treatment of a text is developed through metatextual-description, textual-reduction and suspension.
2. Treating that text as a textual phenomenon in its own meta-textually self-declared textual field of genre.
3. Through suspension seeking a provocative rectification and resolution of their re-simulated constitution, etc.

10.	The Hermeneutical Treatment Of Textuality

1. Hermeneutical treatment is developed through description, suspension and synthetical reconstitution of that text.
2. That primarily this concerns the productive rhetorical treatment of that text through its informed interrogation.
3. Realizing a definitive, but provisional, rhetorical
re-performance of that text through suspension, etc.
4. Through an ongoing suspension of its sequences of provocation letting the text speak through resolution.
5. Through re-iteration of repetitive and non-repetitive 
sequences of juxtaposition and/or parallelization.
6. Producing and re-producing forms and degrees of success diminished through inapplicableness and/or paralysis.

11.	The Existential Treatment Of Textuality

1. The existential treatment of textuality is realized in and through the suspension of that textualized phenomenon.
2. In the spontaneity of judgment our appreciation of the text is realized with a greater degree of clarity.
3. Therein is re-experienced the transcendental power of that text to progressively re-simulate itself.
4. The experiential entry and exit from a text is through
the appropriate exercise of an informed suspension.
5. From such spontaneity is realized retrospectively 
a cognitive re-presentation of that judgment.
6. That a productive suspension is realized between the cognitive treatment of all psychological facets.
7. Through a balance between metaphor and rhetoric, structure and function, thesis and antithesis, etc.
8. The trans-verbal nature of the transcendental suspension, etc., simulating direct access to the text.
9. Through a suspension even of the overall suspension,
revealing the transcendental value of that enterprise.
10. Utterance and re-iteration of the text being realized even through the suspension of that suspension (etc.).
11. Without deliberation the poet must find their voice
through an existential blending of a choir of voices.
12. Through their historical perspective, existential sense of style, collective voice of their culture, etc.

Part IV

12.	Criticality Through Textual Self-Transformation 

1. The most appropriate form of critique is when the phenomenon is able to transcendentally appreciate itself.
2. And this is achieved through a transcendental suspension of the cognitive thematization of that text, etc.
3. Letting the mind naturally reflect the textualized nature of its own relationships and therein re-simulate that text.
4. In the transgression of textual boundaries, edges, etc., commensurability is realized both passively and actively.
5. Transcendental suspensions, reductions, reconstitutions re-instituting the directness of textual re-simulation.
6. Suspension suspending both metaphorical-reduction and rhetorical-reconstitution in this process of re-iteration.
7. The relational excess of the relationship investing our experience of the phenomenon with critical power and value.
8. All value being experienced transcendentally and critically through a self-thematization of that phenomenon.
9. Regardless of whether that phenomenon is 
textually oriented or non-textually oriented.
10. Because all phenomena are textually treated 
and all textuality is phenomenally treated!
11. The simulated resolution of textual-sequences through transformation re-simulating their intentional formation.
12. Conducted systematically under various headings or non-systematically through everyday transcendental intuition.

Conclusion

1. The act of judgment cannot be entertained intentionally,
finding confirmation through conformation, and vice versa.
2. Through simulation, provocation and appreciation
thence simulation, provocation and appreciation.
3. The mind can judge neither the poetic nor the poetical,
only through simulation is such appreciation realized.
4. The mind cannot judge - relationships merely reflect 
this spontaneous understanding through suspension, etc.
5. Let us return to the `text itself' through a closer
appreciation of its dialogue with the meta-textual.
6. Thence hermeneutic appreciation of the poetic
and aesthetic appreciation of the poetical.

Part V

Schema For The Critical Appreciation Of The Poetic(al) Text

1.	Initiating a first reading of the text - approaching the pre-constituted through pre-constituted pre-judgment.
2.	Initiating a meta-textual reading of the text - through an appreciation of genre adoption and adaptation.
3.	Initiating a formal determination of the text - through an explication of formal mechanisms when and where present.
4.	Initiating a psychological schematization of the text -
relating affective, cognitive and transcendental facets.
5.	Determining provocative mechanisms - through mapping and interrelating such re-iterated dialectical features .
6.	Determining parallel metaphorical-rhetorical readings - through the noting of dominant and competing paradigms, etc.
7.	Determining fruitful multi-textual readings - invoking perspectives that reveal an investment surplus in value.
8.	Determining possible emendations in textual reading -
through invoking and arguing for the restoration of text.
9.	Establishing the possible rectification of text -
through permitting reharmonization of provocative processes.
10.	Establishing deconstructive readings of the text - noting contradiction, marginalizations, ill-deployment, etc.
11.	Establishing the voice(s) of the poet - through an overall appreciation of creative/re-creative facets of text.
12.	Establishing a final, provisional reading - through the critical, transcendental re-simulation of hermeneutic value.

Summary of Schema

Initiating readings of text, meta-text, presence of 				formality and psychological differentiation;
Determining readings of the provocative, metaphorical and 			rhetorical, multi-textual and possible emendations;
Establishing rectification, deconstruction, sense of voice 			and the self-critical re-simulation of value.

Part VI

Epitome

Closer appreciation of text through simulating the dialogue between textual-structures and their meta-textual-functions.